Posts Tagged ‘OVP’

Sponsored Post: What does it take to setup a profitable online video store?

August 22nd, 2010

The first answer to the question in the title is of course: great content! Therefore, media companies that own premium content that they believe people will be willing to pay for, are looking for ways to monetize it online, and a paid video service is the most profitable alternative. Nevertheless, content owners used to hesitate before getting involved in the delivery of paid content online because offering secure and easy access to content for authenticated users on multiple devices is far more complex than the normal OVP service. Most media companies assume this requires over-sized initial investment, synchronization between several providers and very specific know-how, but is that really what effectively selling content online requires?

Following the success of Netflix, Hulu Plus (Hulu’s subscription based service) and others, an increasing number of media companies are interested in delivering paid video Over-the-Top (OTT). The summary below presents some of the key characteristics they should be looking at when choosing a video platform for this purpose. These guidelines reflect aggregated experience gathered in pioneering projects in the pay-OTT arena.

  • Deliver content to users where they are used to get it – on any device that may be. Users are willing to pay for an online service only if it brings them tangible added value. A true cross device experience, for example one in which users can search and book content on their iPhone in advance, start viewing it on their PC and finish on their TV, brings this type of added value (just ask Steve Jobs for iTunes’ revenues  before and after they introduced its multi-device service…). Even content owners interested in initially launching a service aimed only for PC users, must keep the option of long term expansion to additional devices available.
  • Offer a variety of subscriptions, pay-per-view packages, coupons and vouchers. It is still unclear which business models work best or what the prices different audiences are willing to pay for different types of content. Therefore, a successful video store should have the flexibility to test any type of business model and pricing structure over time. The ability to grant online vouchers and coupons helps in creating effective partnerships as they provide added value directly related to the corresponding partner or sponsor.
  • Support a variety of local payment methods – The offered payment methods highly affect a video store’s ability to reach one of its main goals: lowering the purchase barrier to a minimum. The popularity of online payment methods significantly varies from country to country, for example: while PayPal and credit cards are essentials in US and Europe, they are not as popular in South America, where any paid online service must support Merkado Libre. They are even more rarely used in Russia, where most online payments are performed through a pre-paid kiosk system.
  • Protect your content, on any device – In order to enable users to access premium content from multiple devices, a video store should be prepared to support multiple DRM mechanisms at once. For example, Widevine DRM is required for delivering content to some Connected TV brands, Marlin DRM is essential for delivering content to PlayStations, and Microsoft PlayReady is the only way to get to X-Box users.
  • Use automatic allocation of revenues to the various content providers – Video Stores normally gather their content from multiple providers. While ads based revenues are fairly easy to allocate (according to the number of views), the different subscription structures (as well as vouchers and coupons) in a video store require for a sophisticated financial reporting system.

Renting out videos across connected devices may be more profitable than serving ads based content, but it is indeed a more completed business.

To learn about how Tvinci makes it easy for you to deliver paid content OTT, click here for our free whitepaper offered by VidCompare.
Google Buzz

10 Definitions to Know When Comparing Online Video Platforms

August 11th, 2010

Here’s a useful list of 10 definitions you should be familiar with when you are looking for a new Online Video Platform (OVP). It’s important to be prepared and knowledgeable when starting out or when switching from one video hosting solution to another. Aside from knowing your use case, get to know these Online Video definitions to ensure a comfortable experience when speaking with an OVP:

  1. Codec – (COmpressor/ DECompressor) -The technology used to compress an audio and/or video file for storage or transmission and then decompress for playback.
  2. Content Delivery Network (CDN) – Companies that deliver video streaming (and other data delivery) via a system of computers networked across the internet containing copies of data to maximize bandwidth for the purpose of delivering content to end users. Each individual system is composed of hundreds-to-thousands of computers allowing networking to be done on a massive scale. A client accesses a copy of the data near to the client, as opposed to all clients accessing the same central server, so as to avoid bottleneck near that server.
  3. Embed – Adding an element from one document to another document; in online video this refers to taking video from a online video provider and transplanting it elsewhere on the web (websites, social networking sites, etc.) through the use of HTML code.
  4. Encoding – The compression of a file through the use of a codec to make it easier and smaller to store and transmit.
  5. H.264 – Standard of video compression pioneered for the purpose of providing good quality video at half the bit rate allowing a larger market access to high quality video and other advertisements.
  6. Metadata – Digitized data of any type that can be used to improve a web video’s measurability, and indexing. Most sharing sites allow forms of metadata such as file descriptions consisting of keywords for web videos.
  7. Online Video Platform (OVP) – An OVP is typically a SaaS (software as a service) solution providing end-to-end tools to manage, publish and measure online video content for both on-demand and live delivery. Typical components of an OVPP include video hosting, encoding, custom players, syndication, analytics, as well as interactivity and monetization through a variety of online advertising options typically 3rd-party ad-servers/networks. Most OVPPs offer scalable product packages for both self-serve SMB publishers up to large media companies.
  8. Progressive Download – A technique for downloading Internet video and/or audio clips so that they can be viewed at the same time that they are being transferred to your computer. This provides some of the benefits of streaming media without requiring a special streaming server. Also known as Pseudo Streaming and HTTP Streaming.
  9. Streaming Media – Internet video and/or audio clips that can play directly over the Internet, without needing to be downloaded first onto a computer. Used to view and hear broadcasts, and to interactively play and seek in stored clips. Also known as Pure Streaming.
  10. Video Format – The file type of a video. Different video formats are used by different programs and/or operating systems. A few of the most popular formats for digital video are .avi (Microsoft), .mov (Quicktime), .wmv (Windows), and .flv (Flash)
Google Buzz

Online Video Hosting Platforms in Transition

August 11th, 2010

The first half of 2010 has proven a few of us wrong. There were predictions made at the end of last year that this would be the defining year for Online Video Platforms, that we’d see strong growth and maturity followed by a shakeout. Some of this has indeed happened, mind you, but not to the degree some of us thought. With over 80 OVPs tracked in the VidCompare database there has certainly been no shortage of growth in the space but the maturity has been a bit slower as has been the shakeout.

With regards to maturity in the space, there needs to be a better understanding of online business’ pain-points and attention to their use cases to show real maturity in my opinion. Some are starting to specialize by honing in on key aspects of their business in an attempt to not only address the needs of online enterprises but also to set themselves apart from the masses. Clearly Ooyala is playing the monetization and analytics card, Unicorn Media and Twistage focusing on  ”workflow” management, Wistia on internal training and behind the firewall solutions, Veeple on interactive video specifically for eLearning, and ProVDN on videographer tools.

And the shakeout has begun but certainly not to the extent as some of us previously thought it would. Kit Digital has been on a buying spree acquiring theFeedroom, and Multicast as well as a few other non-OVPs. SesameVault put themselves on eBay, Motionbox assets were acquired by Shutterfly, and most recently Delve was bought by LimeLight Networks. What’s disconcerting is the fact that this past quarter only one OVP received VC funding (Brightcove) and the acquisitions that have taken place have been at losses. Indeed, the second half of the year is perhaps living up to our 2010 predictions but I’d rather be wrong then to see companies earning less than what they’ve taken in investment. Delve sold for an undisclosed sum but sources close to the deal say it was worth $4 million (cash + stock) which is unfortunately far less than the $10 million invested in the company meaning very few people made any money from the deal.

In the two months since leaving Fliqz, Inc. I’ve had some very interesting conversations with OVP CEOs and upper management about the space and how they plan to weather the next few quarters. Some are looking for an exit of some kind, I know of at least 7 OVPs whom are actively looking for an acquirer. But the market for acquisitions is ugly at best and the CEOs I’ve spoken to on the other side of the coin are looking to pick up technology and/or customers for pennies on the dollar or just straight stock. Other OVPs are planning to place their bets tangentially (within video but not on the OVP itself) for the time being while things shakeout in the platform space stating that there was just too much early growth and investment leading to crowding and a lack of standardization causing confusion among users and lack of focus amongst providers.

There’s no doubt the VidCompare directory with thin over the next 3-4 quarters as the space better defines itself, standards come to fruition, lesser platforms get bought or go out of business, and diversification occurs. My guess is the 80 OVPs we’re tracking today will trim down to roughly 55 or so in the coming quarters. But for the time being it’s a bit of a frenzy as platform providers roll out new services left and right simply to say “we do this” and “we do that” just like the other guy. HTML5, mobile, geolocation, and iPad are all buzzwords that competing platforms make announcements about every other day. This focus on table stakes just isn’t proving to be a winning strategy and until we see more competitive advantages in the form of ground-breaking, niche solutions then last December’s predictions will certainly continue to play out.

Google Buzz

More M&A in Online Video – Snapfish Acquires Motionbox

July 12th, 2010

Today Motionbox announced to their members that their online video sharing technology has been acquired by Snapfish, the video and image sharing product of parent HP. As you will read in the announcement below, free Motionbox users, some 2+ million of them, are invited to sign up for a Snapfish account for a free 30 day trial and are offered a free 8″ x 11″ photo book if they decide to stay on. Existing members have until August 10 to download their video assets from Motionbox after which they will no longer be available.

Back in November of 2009 Motionbox released a paid version of their service in response to high customer demand for enhanced services. They were successful in converting over 300 customers to the $25 a month package which included 25 G’s of streaming and storage. According to Motionbox they are currently looking for a new home for these paid clients and will support a migration process to ensure they are taken care of and are in good hands.

Dear Motionbox member,

Very important news about your Motionbox account! We are pleased to announce that Snapfish by HP has acquired Motionbox Inc.’s video technology platform.

The Motionbox.com service will continue to operate through August 10, 2010. Until then, you’ll be able to log in to your Motionbox account to download videos you wish to save back to your computer. After August 10, 2010, you will not be able to download your videos from Motionbox.

As an industry-leading name in digital photo and video storage and sharing, Snapfish is trusted and preferred by over 90 million members in 22 countries. And, with the technology muscle of parent company HP, Snapfish is your reliable new home to upload, save, and savor your most memorable video moments.

As a Motionbox member, you can now try the Snapfish Home Video service for 30 days – FREE! Here’s all you need to do:

1. Click here to go to Snapfish.
2. Create your Snapfish account, or sign in if you’re already a member.
3. Start enjoying your 30-day free trial today (upon your first video upload).


And, if you are new to Snapfish, we’re eager to introduce you to our additional products and services and offer you a FREE 8″ x 11″ Custom Cover Photo book (a $29.99 value) when you create your new account. Act fast, though – this welcome offer expires July 31, 2010.

We look forward to seeing you at Snapfish, your new home for all your memorable moments.

Cheers!
Snapfish by HP

Motionbox recently lost a very high profile customer, Shutterfly to a yet-to-be-announced competitor in the OVP space. Keep an eye out for that announcement in coming months.

UPDATE: The OVP now powering Shutterfly video is Sorenson Media.

Google Buzz

Panda Stream Putting Their Stamp on Online Video

July 8th, 2010

We recently had the opportunity to catch up with Panda Stream co-founder, Damien Tanner to learn more about their newly launched paid, cloud encoding solution and where they’re heading in the future. The new service, built on AWS, enters into an increasingly popular space with the likes of Encoding.com, Hey! Watch, mPoint, and others offering on-the-fly, simple encoding solutions in the could for businesses of all shapes and sizes. Panda launched an open source version of the service back in early 2008 (pandastream.org) helping people to easily add user video uploading and streaming into their applications. As they watched demand and the space grow they quickly realized that they needed to further develop their one-click solution into something that could meet large scale demand, hence the birth of Panda.

VidCompare: Tell us about the new Panda Stream service.

Damien: At its heart Panda Stream is a highly scalable cloud based video encoding service. Our technology started its life over two years ago as an open source offering which helped people get video encoding systems setup and running on Amazon’s EC2 infrastructure. As we developed the platform we realised that many people would benefit from a completely managed solution, which has brought us to where we are today.

VidCompare: Does the service focus primarily on encoding in the cloud or are you also offering other online video services?

Damien: Early on we made a decision to offer one thing, and do it well. We chose encoding as it’s such a fundamental part of the video ecosystem. Looking at what was already on offer, we felt that although many services provided simple solutions for video publishers, none fully addressed the need for a powerful, configurable encoding system which is cost effect for large volumes.

Although we’ve started by tackling the encoding side of things, this is only the start. Currently we are hard at work on several new features and additional products including a video manager and HTML5 video player.

VidCompare: What does the new service offer that is unique to other services today?

Damien: A big differentiator for us is the cost per video when dealing with a large volume of media. Instead of charging our customers per video, we offer plans which allow you to process an unlimited number of videos for a predictable monthly fee. This type of pricing is particularly well suited to social networks, creative agencies and anyone else who is processing a large number videos per month.

The platform is driven by our elegant REST API and offers a many encoding options. We can encode to and from a huge number of formats. But there are also are handy presets which allow you to add new output formats with only a few clicks. This means the platform is very easy to get started with, but as your requirements change you’ll find that the system is incredibly flexible and powerful.

A great example of this is the iPhone and iPad adaptive HTTP streaming presets we launched last week. With one click you can have all of your videos encoded to five different qualities and packaged to stream to Apple devices. If want to tweak something though, you can dive in and modify every single H.264 encoding parameter.

VidCompare: Panda appears to be a workflow management service allowing customers to utilize certain aspects of your services within their preexisting systems.

Damien: Correct, we started with the API, so the service is very well suited to integrating into existing web applications. Adding in the Panda video uploader plugin doesn’t take long. Once it’s in your users can upload video from within your web application, but the video uploads are in fact sent directly to Panda behind the scenes. This means you don’t have to worry about handling large file uploads. The API stays out of the way of your users, but lets you easily create a seamless video uploading and streaming experience for them.

VidCompare: What’s next for Panda?

Damien: We’re certainly keeping our finger on the pulse and always look for places to make improvements. For example when Google announced the new WebM format, we jumped into action and deployed support within a day!

There are a lot of exciting things in the pipeline. Right now we’re hard at work on a new video manager. We have a little something special up our sleeve for that. It’s going to cater for video publishers as well as people with a large number of assets to manage. Our aim is to help people and companies move their video data into the cloud and have it accessible in any format from anywhere.

We will also be doing more in the HTML5 video space with a player in the works to kick things off.

Finally, we’ve been working with the Ruby hosting platform Heroku (http://heroku.com/) to develop a Panda addon. It’s currently in private beta but will be available to everyone very soon!

Google Buzz

Money Still Pouring into Online Video

July 6th, 2010

I love when Will Richmond at VideoNuze does his quarterly Online Video investment roundups where he gives a brief synopsis of the state of OV investment for the quarter and lists out the companies and how much they raised. It’s fantastic to see the money continue to pour into our sector and encouraging to note that technology is at the forefront as it signifies that we’re still innovating and trying to make OV related products and services stronger.

What’s most interesting about this past quarter’s investments is how little was actually raised by Online Video Platforms. In fact only one, Brightcove, raised incremental funds recently to the tune of $12 million for what was thought to be for small acquisitions though we have not seen any roll-ups yet. But my guess is we will, soon. Kit Digital can’t be the only OVP out there with an acquisition strategy and we’re already seeing/hearing of OVPs whom are looking for further financing and struggling to find it.

Is the “traditional” OVP, offering only the big 5 (ingest, encode, store, manage, playback) going the way of The Feedroom? If they don’t specialize and address a real pain-point then my guess is yes, without a doubt, there will be more M&A in the near future (broken record). What are your thoughts; will we see more specialization in the space, a move towards a DIY workflow method a la Unicorn Media, Twistage, and EOS, or something else altogether?

Google Buzz

Move Networks on the Move

June 30th, 2010

There’s a lot of talk this morning about recent activities over at Move Networks, an early leader in IP video delivery. It seems they’ve laid off the entire staff as mentioned by Will Richmond at VideoNuze leaving only the CFO holding the bag, or what’s left of it. And Ryan Lawler at NewTeeVee pointed out an interesting Tweet by Move this morning suggesting they’re looking for a buyout worth $150 million. We removed Move from the VidCompare directory several months ago when they hired Roxanne Austin and changed their business model, moving further from providing online video platform services.

It’s unfortunate to see another online video business go the way of Veoh, and SesameVault but it’s as we all predicted for this and next year. We’ll definitely see more M&A activity in the OVP space this year and even a few more shutterings but that’s not to say the sector is hurting, not by a long shot. Again, it’s specialization that will keep the big “C” (commodotization) from creeping up on us. Recent announcements from Ooyala with their focus on monetization and analytics, advanced analytics from VMIX, and new technologies from Unicorn Media’s workflow solutions all point to a move towards finding a niche, a need, a purpose.

I don’t think we’ve seen the last of Move, as we haven’t yet of Veoh (recent Tweet: Hey everyone, it’s been a while. But Veoh is coming back in a big way. We can’t wait for you all to see what we have in store.). My guess is they kept CFO, Jamie Harper in place to recap the company in an attempt to hang on long enough to find a buyer.

Google Buzz

Ooyala All About Analytics

June 21st, 2010

Last week Online Video Platform (OVP) Ooyala announced a new and improved analytics platform offering over 500 new analytics reports to its customers including local geotargeted reporting, page-level reports, and social networking sharing data. The enhancements come just months after their move to Cassandra, a highly scalable back end architecture.

We got a tour of the new product which has an elegant UI allowing even novice users to understand. The tools are very robust showing usage data at the city-level allowing customers to glean targeting information to enhance advertising campaigns. They also offer page-level reporting by domain showing publishers how videos perform across various pages of a particular web site. All of these new tools play into Ooyala’s plans of building the online video world’s most robust advertising and analytics solution helping publishers generate the most revenue possible from their video content.

Ooyala is on a technology warpath developing new services left and right. They plan to launch a new Business Intelligence offering in Q3 further enabling them to be the all-in-one source for monetizing online video. To learn more about their new analytics offering read their press release here.

Google Buzz

Brightcove and Long Tail Video get Pay Per View Micropayments via Invideous

June 9th, 2010

Online Video eCommerce is quickly ramping to become a very real and easy option for revenue generation in online video. London based Invideous, parent company Swiffen founded in 2008, recently closed a six-figure round of funding and is announcing an impressive customer list starting with Brightcove and Long Tail Video (Bits On The Run). The service offers publishers the option to charge per view for content via micropayments built directly into the video player which, according to Invideous, takes only 10 minutes to integrate. They offer subscription or pay per view via credit card or SMS with clear and easy to use menus (screen caps below). According to Jack Thorogood, co-founder and Commercial Director, larger publishers can co-brand within the video with a favicon, or logo. And they are also set to roll out two new customers at the end of the month, Kaltura and VMIX.



The Invideous service is very stratighforward which may encourage further adoption of the pay for play model but there have been others in the past that have tried with lackluster results including YouTube, and http://www.vidcompare.com/video-provider-detail.php?id=19although not entirely the same solutions. For example, YouTube tried a pay per download model charging a “personal license fee” and Ooyala’s offering is available in their Backlot allowing viewers to pay for a limited number of shows via an Ooyala branded PayPal account.

There are other interesting OV eComm solutions out there like SundaySky who offer eCommerce websites a service that will take images and product information and mash them into a product video that will dynamically update as the product does. So if specs on a particular camera change, so will the SundaySky video that is associated with it. Pretty slick.

As these services emerge making the monetization of online video easier we are still years out from a unified, standard, and widely accepted means by which to generate revenue from video. Until then, keep monetizing your highly valuable and already monetized web pages with video by syndicating your videos driving traffic back to your site,  increasing engagement, and extending reach.

Google Buzz

Backgrounds – Shooting Online Video Part 5

June 2nd, 2010

Background shots in a video are important and a crucial feature that can be overlooked when starting to shoot video. Whether you’re shooting in a studio, a conference room, or at an off-site location consider what people will be behind the subject. It seems kind of silly to think about when really what you’re thinking about are the shots you need. Yet, in reality a background is what helps highlight the subject and can easily add interest to a video. That said, don’t feel like you need to spend a ton of time on picking a background – especially when you’re shooting on the road. Although, if you’re going to be creating a studio then spend a little bit of time on it and feel free to play around with different backgrounds. Here are a few things to consider when creating a background for online video:

  1. If there’s something in the surroundings that talks to what the video is going to be about, try to incorporate that. For example, what if you’re interviewing an award-winning director. Try to get some of the rewards in the background placed subtly on bookshelves or on a fireplace mantle that would still be in the shot. This adds a bit of interest to the video and reminds people of the credentials of the person being interviewed without you having to dedicate a lot of video time to it.
  2. Try to stay away from white. First, white is not exciting to look at. Think about it. Put something in front of a white background and it’s just not that interesting. Of course, if you’re doing a product photo you definitely want to do that, but this is not a product picture. This is a video. It should have interest. If that’s not enough, lighting white backgrounds isn’t the easiest thing in the world and you could be dealing with a lot of shadows looming in the background. Don’t get me wrong shadows aren’t necessarily a bad thing, but they’re definitely something you want to control in a shot and not the other way around.
  3. Creating a studio to shoot your online videos? Definitely spend the time experimenting with backgrounds. Consider what you want to see in every video since this is a good way to create consistency. Is it a company name? Is it worth getting a banner made or will that be something you add during editing? What is the mood/feeling you’re trying to convey in your video?  Think about how a background can contribute to that.
  4. Green screens. Yay or Nay? By this point you might have heard of green screens or even taken the tour at Universal Studios as a child that shows you how ET was able to fly through the air. Green screens essentially let you shoot something and fill in the background later. That’s cool, right? Could serve all your background problems, right? Not so fast. You also need a lot of space to use them effectively. For example, you’ll need to make sure you have at least 6 feet between the subject being shot and the green screen behind them. Not everyone has that much space available. Besides that this is video for online, not some Hollywood blockbuster.

Here’s the magic sauce about backgrounds: They can change. Don’t be afraid to try out a few different options. Do your best not to make them too busy since that can distract from the “star” of your video, but don’t be afraid to move things around – especially if you’re shooting on location.

Read all previous parts to this ongoing series, Shooting Online Video:

Part 4 – Lighting And Content

Part 3 – Picking A Camera

Part 2 – SD or HD

Part 1 – Just Do It!

Google Buzz